this is for holding javascript data
Christopher edited untitled.tex
about 9 years ago
Commit id: 4e521fdd6037c1d5ab9851c6be115237b3554b82
deletions | additions
diff --git a/untitled.tex b/untitled.tex
index d248e8f..df91c82 100644
--- a/untitled.tex
+++ b/untitled.tex
...
\textbf{Thesis Progress Report}
\textbf{Introduction}
The goal of
the this thesis is to compare the
stellar mass growth
rate vs current mass of local group
dwarf galaxies with distant
ones. The following progress has been made. galaxies. This
report will also cover progress made last term (this work was
then started in the fall, but was registered with the astronomy
department). department. As this is the first term registered in the Physics department, this progress report will cover work done since the fall.
\textbf{Data}
The early part of the project was dominated by trying to understand the data that would be used.
The
main data
set used for distant galaxies was presented in \cite{Tomczak_2014}.
This paper contains a table of mass vs number density (number of galaxies per unit volume) for $0.2 < z < 3$. However, while we plotted this data and various subsets of it (only star forming or quiescent galaxies) we do not use the raw data. Instead, we use a paramaterised double Schechter function which smooths the data and ensures the number density at each mass is monotonically increasing as $z \leftarrow 0$
We do not use the raw data
We made various graphs to better understand how the growth rate was affected by whether the galaxy was quiescent or star forming. We checked their use of Schechter and Double Schechter functions, before paramaterising the Schechter function to smooth the relationship and ensure that the number density at a specific mass increased monotonically as z approached 0 \cite{Leja_2015}. With this done, graphs showing the change in mass over time between Z = 3 and Z = 0 were constructed for various start masses.
A second distant galaxy data set was also introduced later in the project. This data, taken from \cite{Whitaker_2014} was used to confirm that the results were reasonable and backed up by other data. Again, a paramaterisation rather that raw data was used.