deletions | additions       diff --git a/sectionIntroduction_.tex b/sectionIntroduction_.tex  index 645a838..e5b2ec4 100644  --- a/sectionIntroduction_.tex  +++ b/sectionIntroduction_.tex 
...
There are various statistical mechanical models of the polymer collapse phase transition \cite{gennes1979a-a,vanderzande1998a-a}. However, there are two basic elements in each of the models: on the one \cite{gennes1979a-a} hand, the configurations of the polymer have some type of so-called excluded volume, that implies molecules are separate in space, and on the other hand the configurations have an attractive force between different parts of the polymer, that drives the transition. On lattices, both self-avoiding walks (SAW), where different sites of walk avoid being on the same site of the lattice, and self-avoiding trails (SAT), which are walks that can share sites though not bonds of the lattice, have been used as the configuration space for collapse models. The attractive force has been modelled both by adding energies for shared sites and also via so-called nearest-neighbour contacts, where sites adjacent on the lattice not joined by a step of the walk are given an energy. When SAW are coupled with nearest neighbour interactions the canonical ISAW model is reproduced (see \cite{vanderzande1998a-a} for a review), while when trails are coupled with site interactions the ISAT model \cite{Malakis_1976} is reproduced. Despite what one might expect from the principle of universality the collapse of these models appears to behave differently \cite{Shapir_1984,Owczarek_1995,Owczarek_2007}.  A recent study \cite{Bedini:2013eg} \cite{Bedini_2013}  considered self-avoiding trails interacting via nearest-neighbour contacts (INNSAT) as a hybrid of the two models. Evidence from computer simulations showed that the collapse transition in INNSAT is different from the collapse transition in ISAT, which is a strong second order transition, but similar to ISAW which is predicted to be a weak second order transition where the specific heat converges at the transition. In ISAW collapse one needs to consider the third derivative of the free energy to see a divergent quantity and then only weakly divergent. It was also found that the low-temperature phase of the two trail-collapse models differ substantially: the phase associated with multiply visited site interactions is fully dense in the thermodynamic limit (as shown in \cite{Bedini:2013kd}). \cite{Bedini_2013}).  The low-temperature phase associated with nearest-neighbour contacts wasn't fully dense as is believed to be the case for interacting self-avoiding walks \cite{Owczarek:1993bk}. \cite{Owczarek_1993}.  \subsection{Magnetic Systems}  The properties of lattice polymers are also related to those of magnetic systems near their critical point \cite{Vanderzande:1998vp}. More precisely, self-avoiding walks configurations appear as the diagrams of the high-temperature expansion of an $O(n)$ magnetic system when taking the formal limit of zero components ($n \to 0$), and their scaling exponents can be obtained from the $O(n)$ critical point. In this mapping the collapse transition corresponds to a tri-critical point of the magnetic system and one would hope to obtain the critical exponents for the polymer collapse transition from the ones of this tri-critical point.