Benedict Irwin edited The 90 Thing.tex  over 9 years ago

Commit id: 6e6d23365c01d2f39617201429e663f32c6e4d93

deletions | additions      

       

Moreover [check this next bit]  The non-existance of a $q$ in the range [1,n] that $n-q \; \mathrm{mod} \; (1+2q) = 0$, then $(90;;n)+1$, is neccesary but not sufficient for a primality check. However, for larger $n$, it may be expected that this check becomes more and mor elike a primality check??? [Why?]