deletions | additions       diff --git a/section_Conclusion_and_Recommendation_Based__.tex b/section_Conclusion_and_Recommendation_Based__.tex  index 0650d22..f0df9a2 100644  --- a/section_Conclusion_and_Recommendation_Based__.tex  +++ b/section_Conclusion_and_Recommendation_Based__.tex 
...
\section{Conclusion and Recommendation}  Based on the criteria described above, a bigger $k$ would give better results since the variance within clusters decreases. Thus, lessening the chances of having a mixed infected and healthy pixels on the same cluster. However, more clusters would mean additional computational complexity and longer processing times. K-Means alone has a computational complexity of $(n^d^k+1log n)$ $k$