Refiloe edited subsection_The_Liu_Quasar_Pair__.tex  over 8 years ago

Commit id: 1b3c1c6ad1d318ed01bdb13d49372d9db1c4847c

deletions | additions      

       

The choice to use projected separations $rp < {100h_{70})}^{-1}$ kpc to refine the sample space – remove chance superpositions g - ${100h_{70})}^{-1}$ is the Hubble constant, which accounts for /is a measure of the expansion rate of the universe ( more details in \cite{Huchra_1992}). Lui further observes that most pairs with separation greater than 100 kpc are found to be closely separated but not interacting with one another. Selecting those with separation less than 100 kpc helps remove these points that are not a part of our sample space. It is surprising to note that 100 kpc is larger than the thresholds used in other galaxy pair studies namely (Barton et al. 2000; Ellison et al. 2008; Darg et al. 2010), but lui does not explain why 100 kpc is used as the threshold.  Lui further Justifies the use a LOS velocity offset $ \Delta v < 600 km.s^{-1}$ as a method to further refine the desired sample space. Plotting the distribution of $\Delta v$ of AGN pairs (Figure 2 provided in Liu) shows us that that most AGN pairs in the catalogue are found within the $300 \lsim   \Delta v < 600 km.s^{-1} $interval. Even so, Lui et all further states that Δv range within which the pair is still interacting depends on the environment – there could be a chance that some data point were erroneously cut from the sample. Visual inspection of SDSS images for spectroscopically selected images further removes 34 AGN pairs from the parent sample. Perhaps their spectroscopic profiles do not match those of interacting pairs. What was the criteria for this- is still left unanswered.  Lui also notes possible outliers and common trends in our refined sample space. The surprising, sixteen data points with z> 0.16 ,which seem to be outliers are kept in our sample. They are said to reduce uncertainties at higher red-shifts.