this is for holding javascript data
Matt McCarthy edited tangibleUI.tex
about 10 years ago
Commit id: 09efb59138f36c685dcdedda5cf50ee036d43b1f
deletions | additions
diff --git a/tangibleUI.tex b/tangibleUI.tex
index 73edf9a..74167c1 100644
--- a/tangibleUI.tex
+++ b/tangibleUI.tex
...
\subsubsection{Concurrent access and manipulation of interface components}
Unfortunately, one of The interface components used are the
limitations of our system rotation vector sensor and accelerometer, which both operate concurrently to control speed and direction. Feedback is
that devices cannot be operated concurrently. concurrently given to the user regarding how their inputs change the game state. This
criterion is
a software limitation and given more time this could be developed such that concurrent usage would be allowed. therefore met.
\subsubsection{Strong specific devices}
The 'devices' within the android phone can represent the sensors inside the device, with the screen and vibration motor being output devices. Each
individual component has device fulfils a
specific task that it achieves, and it can achieve only that tasks. Due to this we agree that we have met this objective. single task, the sum of which produces a game.
\subsubsection{Spatially aware computational devices}
Our components are at The basis of the application is for the
moment device to be spatially
unaware aware, as this is the method for moving around the map. The device is aware of
tilt and direction within the
surroundings. real world. In
future revisions this could easily be addressed previous versions of the application we used the GPS sensor to
include more interaction with the physical environment by adding sensors attached make the device aware of its location in space, and this was only removed to
streamline the
main interface kit. performance. We would argue that this criterion has been met.
\subsubsection{Spatial reconfigurability of devices}
At the current moment in time, our devices are only functional for one specific purpose and cannot be reconfigured spatially. Again this is something that could easily be addressed in future developments of the system.
\subsubsection{Conclusion on tangible interface eligibility}