Tobias C Hinse edited untitled.tex  over 8 years ago

Commit id: 8fd9f4fbaf14587cfeec0a2a639fef2bfd4e7b1a

deletions | additions      

       

%  2449310.332595 & 0.0000230 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & EUVE, \cite{Warren_1995} \\  2449276.680076 & 0.0000230 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & EUVE, \cite{Warren_1995} \\  %  2448784.721419 & 0.0000300 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & HST, \cite{Potter_2011} \\  %  2448483.606635 & 0.0000200 & 4.413 & 4.20E-5 & 0.0000300 & 0.0000400 & 0.0000400 & ROSAT, \cite{Ramsay1994} \\ 

2447088.742545 & 0.0003000 & 0.069 & 7.89E-5 & 0.0000600 & 0.0000500 & 0.0000700 & ESO/MPI 2.2m, \cite{Beuermann1988} \\  %  2446446.973823 & 0.0001600 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & EXOSAT, \cite{Osborne_1988} \\  2445567.177636 & 0.0001600 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & EXOSAT, \cite{Osborne_1988} \\  \end{tabular}   \caption{55 mid-eclipse times of the main accretion spot of UZ For. BJD(TDB) are barycentric Julian date time stamps in the TDB time system. All figures are in units of days. The time span of various data sets are as follows: ESO/MPI 2.2m: 9.0 days; AAT (Ferrario 1989): 18 days; 2.3m Steward obs. (Berriman 1988): 1 day; AAT (Bailey & Cropper 1991): 1 day; ROSAT (Ramsay 1994): 0.9 days; CTIO (Imamura et al. 1998, all data): 270 days; CTIO (Imamura et al. 1998, set I): 3 days; CTIO (Imamura et al. 1998, set II): 3 days; WHT/S-Cam (Perryman et al. 2001): 6 days; UCTPOL/1.9m (Potter et al. 2011): 3 days. The data from HIPPO/1.9m (Potter et al. 2011) were taken as presented in their paper due to a too long time span of any 3-point data set of which the shortest is around 50 days.}   \label{NewTimingData}