deletions | additions       diff --git a/untitled.tex b/untitled.tex  index ef136de..74bedd6 100644  --- a/untitled.tex  +++ b/untitled.tex 
...
\section{intro}  Graphene has garnered a lot of interest for its unique electronic properties and its potential applications. Graphene is a two-dimensional form of carbon in which atoms are arranged in a honeycomb lattice. It is a zero-gap semiconductor, this allows the ability to dope graphene to have high concentrations by applying a voltage. This property of electric gating also used to control conductivity and dielectric constant of graphene. There is extensive research on the many properties of this monolayer of carbon but I will focus on conductivty, surface waves supported by graphene, and research into applications with optical modulators. \\  There are two absorption properties that are involved in light-graphene interaction, interband and intraband absorption for small signals. This is described by the complex conductivity, \[\sigma_g=\sigma_{intra}(\omega,\mu_c,\Gamma,T)+\sigma_{inter}(\omega,\mu_c,\Gamma,T)\], where $\omega$ is the angular frequency of light, $\mu_c$ is the chemical potential, $\Gamma$ is scattering rate, and $T$ is the temperature [1].Whats interesting is that the chemical potential can be tuned with electrical gating, thus the conductivity can be controlled by the same process. Chemical potential also controls what absorption process is occurring.Interband corresponding to absorption from the valence band to conduction band and intraband absoprtion corresponding to absoprtion from a semiconductor like optical property to a metal like optical property [2]. For incoming light with energy $\hbar \omega$, interband absoprtion dominates when $\mu_c < \frac{\hbar \omega}{2}$ and intraband dominates when $\mu_c > \frac{\hbar \omega}{2}$ and it is theoretically predicted that intraband absoprtion would be dominate when $\mu_c \approx \frac{\hbar \omega}{1.67}$ [2]. Zhaolin Lu et al investigates graphene conductivty at $T=300 K$ with a scattering rate $\hbar \Gamma=5 meV$. Figure 1 plots real and imaginary parts of conductivity vs chemical potential and the dielectric constant as a funciton of chemical potential. Notice the sensitivity of conductivity with little change in chemical potential. Here $\epsilon_{eff}=1-\frac{\delta_g}{i\omega\epsilon_0\Delta}$ where $\Delta=0.7 nm$ is the effective thickness of graphene. Notice the dip in in the magnitude of the effective dielectric constant, goes below zero at $\mu_t$. Physically this is the transition from a metal type graphene to a dielectric type graphene. The transition chemical potential is $\mu_t=0.515 eV$ for this experiment. Theoretical value from [1] predicts $\mu_t=0.479 eV$ which has about 7 $\%$ error. Since conductivity can be tuned by electrical gating so can the effective dielectric constant.