this is for holding javascript data
adam greenberg edited results.tex
about 10 years ago
Commit id: 125f89d3a38e6cc94a686266589bd2f8ee353fca
deletions | additions
diff --git a/results.tex b/results.tex
index b34bf20..6fa1b70 100644
--- a/results.tex
+++ b/results.tex
...
adsf \section{Results}
\subsection{Simulated data}
Figure blah.blah shows comparisons of SPF vs SRIF attempting to fit simulated data to a given model. Note that for certain starting conditions, SPF outperforms SRIF for a large fraction of the total fitting time. SRIF pays an initial overhead cost due to the need to generate a new derivative matrix per iteration, as well as to perform the Householder operations. These overheads mean that each SRIF iteration is substantially longer than each SPF iteration. However, if the fit takes long enough, SRIF tends to converge before SPF (if SPF converges at all). Tables ? and ? show overall run statistics for the tests plotted in figure ?. Note that SRIF performed an order of magnitude faster than SPF for the one test that SPF converged.
\subsection(Real data: ET70}
I have run \textbf{shape} with the new fitting routine on the asteroid 2000 ET70. ET70 has had its shape fit in the past, using \textbf{shape} and the SPF fitting routine (reference shantanu).
