Klaus edited Results1.tex  over 8 years ago

Commit id: 168892c4d83080a368b4e8574a9785f6e7c1136b

deletions | additions      

       

\section{Results \& Discussion}  Typical single photon events detected with the EBCCD are shown in Fig~\ref{fig1}c,d. The central peak is high with small wings: during the diffusion of the electrons from the back of the sensor to the front, the charge spills over into adjacent pixels. Brighter, larger ion events are also detected, caused by a photoelectron ionising a residual gas molecule in the imperfect vacuum inside the EBCCD tube, leading to the resulting ion being accelerated towards the photocathode (Fig~\ref{fig1}c,d, top). These ion events cause problems with event recognition algorithms that find a threshold for each frame separately: the high brightness causes the threshold to be set too high high,  and the photon events are  discarded as noise. The raw data was therefore preprocessed using ImageJ's tools by setting the intensity of all bright pixels in the ion events to a grey value slightly above the maximum intensity of the photons events. The ion events are then incorrectly localised as photon events, but due to the relatively rare occurrence of ion events compared to photon events (i.e.\ an ion event every few frames) this does not have a noticeable effect on the results. Photon counting images of the USAF test chart are shown in Fig~\ref{fig_results}. As the photon events are relatively dim compared to the high camera background noise, the sum of the frames without any processing produces a noisy image (Fig~\ref{fig_results}b), while centroiding with one pixel accuracy removes the camera background and produces a clearer image (Fig~\ref{fig_results}c). Centroiding with 1/5-pixel accuracy (Fig~\ref{fig_results}d) seems to recover some of the resolution lost by the electron diffusion in the sensor, as shown in Fig~\ref{fig_results}e.