this is for holding javascript data
Aldo Nassigh edited section_Discussion_and_Conclusios_Following__.tex
almost 9 years ago
Commit id: 993dfb783350447d0e7d0733c32984f0db7c843d
deletions | additions
diff --git a/section_Discussion_and_Conclusios_Following__.tex b/section_Discussion_and_Conclusios_Following__.tex
index 444c34f..cb850df 100644
--- a/section_Discussion_and_Conclusios_Following__.tex
+++ b/section_Discussion_and_Conclusios_Following__.tex
...
\section{Discussion and Conclusios}
Following the main results outlined above, the target of the wise building manager is to avoid that the average server utilization becomes too high at rush hour, so as to prevent the divergence of the average waiting time.
\\
In the case proposed in question a. the \subsection{Question a}
The traffic intensity is $a = 4.5$ \textit{Erlangs}\footnote{$3$ groups per minute times $1.5$ minutes service time}. With $c=5$ elevators, the average server utilization of corporate A is very high: $\rho = 4.5 / 5 = 0.9$. The average waiting time \eqref{Tim} is $2'$ $17''$, that is, it is \textbf{ longer} than the average service time ($W_s=1'$ $30''$). \\
By adding one more elevator, so that $c=6$, the building manager of corporate B decreases the average server utilization to $\rho = 4.5 / 6 = 0.75$. The average waiting time \eqref{Tim} is $25''$, that is, it is \textbf{one third} of the average service time ($W_s=1'$ $30''$). \\
The building manager of corporate B was able to take advantage of the non-linearity of the problem: the increase by $20\%$ in the number of elevators translate into the decrease by $80\%$ of the average waiting
time.\\ time.