this is for holding javascript data
Simon McGill edited untitled.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 6405ee500704df7af74720b7c136e4ada891867c
deletions | additions
diff --git a/untitled.tex b/untitled.tex
index 6ffcae7..5f5a1a8 100644
--- a/untitled.tex
+++ b/untitled.tex
...
Given a cognitive interpretation, we can project the agent's physical internal state into a space of cognitive variables. Consequently, we can observe a ``cognitive dynamics'': the changes in the agent's (attributed) beliefs and desires caused by sensory input (and responsible for actuator output).
\subsection{Theories Of Rationality}
By itself, the cognitive interpretation
$C$ is meaningless, since there are no semantics attached to the attributed cognitive content of the agent's mind. It acquires meaning only when coupled with a theory of
rationality: rationality $R$: a normative ideal of how beliefs and desires should be related to sensations and actions.
We will define a
$\Tau$ theory of rationality $R$ as a function describing, for an agent with cognitive state $(b, d, \phi) \in B \times D \times \Phi$, faced with sensory input $s \in S$, what the rational options are for the agent's next beliefs, desires and actions.
\[ R: B \times D \times \Phi \times S \rightarrow \to 2^B \times 2^D \times 2^A \]
...where $2^X$ denotes the powerset of $X$