Camilo Lopez-Aguirre edited untitled.tex  almost 9 years ago

Commit id: d8735ef84fde5a58881f112a81c4e97a4d869941

deletions | additions      

       

By comparing the graphical output of the CVAs obtained for the symmetric and asymmetric component of the variation, it was clear that the asymmetric component is more accurate to discriminate the three species. The symmetric component was not useful to discriminate neither of the three species, overlapping almost completely the species all along the morphospace. Despite the presence of a certain degree of overlapping between species in the asymmetric component, most of the samples were accurately discriminated, suggesting that morphological differences between these species are better represented in their asymmetric variation.   \textbf{Figure 2.} CVA The overlapping found on both components opens the question of what other mechanisms and patterns rely behind the morphological variation on \textit{Carollia} species.