deletions | additions       diff --git a/subsection_Review_selection_and_data__.tex b/subsection_Review_selection_and_data__.tex  index 4730c9f..ec652c3 100644  --- a/subsection_Review_selection_and_data__.tex  +++ b/subsection_Review_selection_and_data__.tex 
...
\subsection{Review selection and data extraction}  We used Covidence (covidence.org) to initially screen articles based on the title and abstract. To qualify as a systematic review, studies had to summarize evidence across multiple studies and provide information on the search strategy, such as search terms, databases, or inclusion/exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were classified as quantitative syntheses of results across multiple studies \cite{25194857}. Two screeners independently categorized all articles, and a follow-up meeting was held to discuss differences in screening. All disagreements were settled by consensus. Full-text articles were obtained via EndNote.