Paul Dennis edited untitled.tex  over 8 years ago

Commit id: 458dc0494684026436b3ef6d62df9929808131f0

deletions | additions      

       

Table 2 lists values of t for different values of V. The values of V were chosen corresponding to the volumes of fluid expelled from an overpressured 40km x 1000m thick sediment sequence at depth within the Edale basin with incremental changes in porosity of 0.1, 1 and 10\% on dewatering. These porosity changes range from the smallest incremental changes calculated for individual dewatering pulses of overpressured sediments to the integrated maximum volume of fluid that might be expelled \citep{Cathles:1983tj}. The corresponding values of t are 16, 1723 and 173500 years respectively. These correspond to mean fluxes of 285, 26.5 and 0.26 litres.m^{-1}.hr^{-1}. Such flow rates are not geologically unrealistic. The highest rates associated with the smallest fluid pulses are on the order of the rates of effusion from springs that have been monitored for periods of several years following moderate earthquakes e.g (add refs by Nur and Tsuneishi et al., 1970).  One can legitimately question the model details and parameter estimates but the point of this somewhat heuristic approach is not to be an accurate model. It is to give an indication of the flow rates that are needed to sustain the maximum observed thermal anomaly within the Dirtlow Rake and Castleton  faultsystem  assuming a physical system that couples fluid overpressure and faulting. An important corollary is that mineralization is episodic with separate events spanning limited periods up to several thousand to several ten thousand years separated by periods of stasis. This observation is convergent with recent data on the Zn content of mineralizing fluids determined from fluid inclusions in several MVT provinces that suggests mineralization events could be of durations as short as 10,000 years \citep{Bodnar:2009hc, Wilkinson06022009}.