this is for holding javascript data
Andreas Luedeke edited sectionINTRODUCTION_.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 90bd1333e5a959284984088098d743f799cb81f5
deletions | additions
diff --git a/sectionINTRODUCTION_.tex b/sectionINTRODUCTION_.tex
index 885f2f5..a267b96 100644
--- a/sectionINTRODUCTION_.tex
+++ b/sectionINTRODUCTION_.tex
...
new large scale facilities as for example the International Linear Collider~\cite{Himel_2007}.
An operation metrics should quantify the reliability of a particle accelerator.
If the objective is to assess the improvement of a specific facility over time,
then the operation
metric metrics should be very closely related to the specific
user requirements for that facility~\cite{Luedeke:2014aa}.
But in order to compare the reliability of different facilities one needs a
common standard for the calculation of the operation metrics.
...
In particular beam availability is often used to compare the reliability of light sources.
While these statistics are published for most light sources,
few facilities do supply definitions on how these numbers are calculated.
A survey of several light sources revealed~\cite{L_deke_2009}
that the calculation of this
metric metrics varies considerably.
The conditions under which beam is considered available are often defined in common sense terms,
and even if there are formal definitions, they differ between facilities.
Furthermore a large variety of failure modes is often convoluted into ``beam not available'',
...
The metrics serve to clarify for each facility the beam parameter promised to the users,
and the statistical data reveal, how well the standards are met.
The authors are convinced that the application of this metrics will refine our ability
to learn from the reliability comparison of light sources.