this is for holding javascript data
Andreas Luedeke edited sectionPROPOSED_SECO.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 51048d66b9192df1a4d0acb42c5bfafdb39e65c1
deletions | additions
diff --git a/sectionPROPOSED_SECO.tex b/sectionPROPOSED_SECO.tex
index 3fd9b5d..0d0f023 100644
--- a/sectionPROPOSED_SECO.tex
+++ b/sectionPROPOSED_SECO.tex
...
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{\label{tab:blow-up-limits}
``Beam-blow-up'' Beam-blow-up limits}
\scriptsize
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{lrrl}\scriptsize \begin{tabular}{lrrl}
\textbf{Facility}&\textbf{typical dimension}&\textbf{size increase}&\textbf{Remark}\\\hline
& (µm x µm) & & \\
ALBA & 70 x 30 & 20\% & recorded \\
...
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{\label{tab:filling-limits} Distorted-filling limits for different facilities}
\scriptsize
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{lrl}\scriptsize \begin{tabular}{lrl}
\textbf{Facility}&\parbox[c]{2.25cm}{\textbf{Bunch charge deviation}}&\textbf{Remark}\\\hline
ALBA & - & planned for 2015 \\
BESSY II & 10\% & recorded \\
...
{\em ``Short-user-time''} are for most facilities just subtracted in the beam availability calculations;
they are not recorded as a failure mode.
An independent recording would enable to calculate beam availability with and without accounting for the ``short-user-time'.
This would improve the comparison between facilities that handle ``short-user-time'' differently.