Andreas Luedeke edited sectionPROPOSED_SECO.tex  almost 9 years ago

Commit id: 2156aa0b2133220a06d7d018c77caa8de2f588a3

deletions | additions      

       

& (µm x µm) & & \\  ALBA & 70 x 30 & 20\% & recorded \\  BESSY II & 250 x 14 & 30\% & recorded \\  Elettra & 260 x 10 & 10\% & no on-line \\  & & &  measurement yet \\ LNLS-UVX & 1000 x 120& 10\% & recorded \\  PETRA III & 140 x 7 & - & \\  SPring-8 & 100 x 12 & - & \\  SLS & 50 x 10 & 50\% & recorded and yearly \\  & & &  evaluated \\ \end{tabular}  \end{ruledtabular}  \end{table} 

Elettra & - & no on-line measurement \\  LNLS-UVX & - & no on-line measurement \\  PETRA III & - & no on-line measurement \\  SPring-8 & 10\% & recorded, \parbox[t]{3.25cm}{recorded,  deviation after accumulation neglected \\ neglected}\\  SLS & 100\% & feedback outages recorded\\  \end{tabular}  \end{ruledtabular} 

Table~\ref{tab:sf-limits} shows a comparison of secondary failure modes:  if they are on-line recorded at the different facilities and which failure modes are reported  in yearly statistics to the public.  \begin{table} \begin{table*}  \centering  \caption{\label{tab:sf-limits}Secondary failure modes at different facilities}  \scriptsize 

SLS & on-line & on-line & report & on-line & 1.0 \\  \end{tabular}  \end{ruledtabular}  \end{table} \end{table*}  \subsection{Discussion of the Secondary Failure Modes}