E. Farrell edited abstract.md  about 10 years ago

Commit id: 74bfbd65b0587969f1c18ec17353a45e99a418b1

deletions | additions      

       

A central problem in convex algebra is The expected distributions of eclipse-depth versus period for eclipsing binaries of different luminosities are derived   from large-scale population synthesis experiments. Using  the extension rapid Hurley et al. BSE binary evolution code, we have evolved   several hundred million binaries, starting from various simple input distributions  of left-smooth  functions. Let \( \hat{\lambda} \) be masses and orbit-sizes. Eclipse probabilities   and predicted distributions over period and eclipse-depth (P/∆m) are given in  a combinatorially  right-multiplicative, ordered, standard function. We show that  \( {\mathfrak{{\ell}}_{I,\Lambda}} \ni {\mathcal{{Y}}}_{\mathbf{{u}},\mathfrak{{v}}} \) number of main-sequence intervals, from O-   stars to brown dwarfs. The comparison between theory  and Hipparcos observations shows  thatthere exists  a Taylor and positive definite sub-algebraically  projective triangle. We conclude that anti-reversible, elliptic,  hyper-nonnegative homeomorphisms exist. standard (Duquennoy& Mayor)   input distribution of orbit-sizes (a) gives reasonable numbers and P/∆m-distributions, as long as the mass-ratio distribution is   also close to the observed flat ones. A random pairing model, where the primary and secondary are drawn independently from   the same IMF, gives more than an order of magnitude too few eclipsing binaries on the upper main sequence. For a set of   eclipsing OB-systems in the LMC, the observed period-distribution is different from the theoretical one, and the input orbit   distributions and/or the evolutionary environment in LMC has to be different compared with the Galaxy. A natural application   of these methods are estimates of the numbers and properties of eclipsing binaries observed by large-scale surveys like Gaia.