this is for holding javascript data
Brian Jackson edited subsection_The_P__rm_act__.tex
almost 9 years ago
Commit id: 4e515794a0797f78ac52f552f4b3d9ff23f6e59e
deletions | additions
diff --git a/subsection_The_P__rm_act__.tex b/subsection_The_P__rm_act__.tex
index 5fbcae3..edb30fd 100644
--- a/subsection_The_P__rm_act__.tex
+++ b/subsection_The_P__rm_act__.tex
...
\subsection*{The
$P_{\rm act}$ $P$ Recovery Bias}
Not surprisingly, the devils with the smallest $P_{\rm act}$-values are the most difficult to detect since relatively close (small $b$) encounters are required for $P_{\rm obs} > P_{\rm min}$ and such encounters are more rare. For example, $b = 0$ would be required for a devil with $P_{\rm act} = P_{\rm min}$ to be detected, an encounter geometry with a infinitesimally small probability.
The probability for a devil to be detected is proportional to the area $A$ over its pressure profile for which $P(r) \ge P_{\rm min}$, which is $A = \pi r^2(P_{\rm act}) = \pi \left( \dfrac{\Gamma_{\rm act}(P_{\rm act})}{2} \right)^2 \left( \dfrac{P_{\rm act} - P_{\rm min}}{P_{\rm min}} \right)$. We're interested in the way in which this bias shifts the recovered distribution $n(P_{\rm obs})$ toward larger $P_{\rm obs}$, so we can calculate the relative recovery probability by taking the ratio
...