this is for holding javascript data
Brian Jackson edited subsection_The_Pressure_Signal_Full__.tex
almost 9 years ago
Commit id: 3519104fdc45cd3b9581377acb23bbcd8c08b28f
deletions | additions
diff --git a/subsection_The_Pressure_Signal_Full__.tex b/subsection_The_Pressure_Signal_Full__.tex
index 3ad9f2b..600e40f 100644
--- a/subsection_The_Pressure_Signal_Full__.tex
+++ b/subsection_The_Pressure_Signal_Full__.tex
...
\subsection*{The Pressure Signal Full-Width/Half-Max Recovery Bias and Distortion}
Now turning to $\Gamma$-values. A bias similar to that above favors recovery of devils with larger $\Gamma_{\rm act}$-values, and by analogy, we can cast this recovery bias in terms of relative areas, holding $P_{\rm act}$ constant:
\begin{equation}
f_{\rm \left( P_{\rm act}
= =\ {\rm const.} \right)} \equiv \left( \dfrac{\Gamma_{\rm
act}(P_{\rm act})}{\Gamma_{\rm act}(P_{\rm max})} act}}{\Gamma_{\rm max}} \right)^2,
\end{equation}
where we've suppressed the constant factor involving the pressures.
...
\dfrac{dp}{d\Gamma_{\rm obs}} = 8 \Gamma_{\rm act}^{-2}\ \Gamma_{\rm obs}.
\end{equation}
Again combining this expression with the recovery bias gives the probability density for a devil with a given $\Gamma_{\rm act}$-value to be observed with a $\Gamma_{\rm obs}$-value, and Figure \ref{fig:} illustrates the probability density.