deletions | additions       diff --git a/section_Future_plans_subsection_Preliminary__.tex b/section_Future_plans_subsection_Preliminary__.tex  index cbd29ac..9ac38a5 100644  --- a/section_Future_plans_subsection_Preliminary__.tex  +++ b/section_Future_plans_subsection_Preliminary__.tex 
...
In the near future, another journal paper on completing the agent design and implementation is awaiting submission. A conference paper on the ontology and the display logic is planned after conducting an end-user experiment on how to achieve situational awareness with furnishing or not different types of information to different users.  The future plan on each dimension includes:  \begin{itemize}  \item \textbf{ontology} To validate and evaluate the constructed and gradually improved ontology against all requirements and users of the project during TRADR evaluation and experimentation events. To conduct an end-user experiment to determine the level of adequacy of the ontology. To evaluate the ontology from the graphical interface's and cognitive agents' point of view.  The current ontology will go through major changes as all the modules and the comprehensive ontology design is worked out to the detail. A full validation and evaluation is following the pipeline for ensuring the level of adequacy of the ontology to the project. \item \textbf{agents} In the distant future, more reasoning power is requested from the agents, that now should be able to have a very high control over the visual interface of the user.   Comparison OWL-Prolog agents  \item \textbf{display logic} End-user experiment and paper about what type of information to show to whom, which categories, levels of priorities, how does it affect CTL.  \end{itemize}  \subsection{Publication Plan} 
...
\begin{itemize}  \item Year 1 : workshop paper at AAMAS 2015  \item Year 2 : conference paper on the ontology design, journal paper on the agents design, conference paper on the display logic features  \item Year 3 : conference paper on the evaluation of the ontology ontology, conference paper on the comparison of OWL and Prolog agents  \item Year 4 : dissertation   \end{itemize} 
...
\subsection{Execution Timeline}