Chuck results edits  almost 9 years ago

Commit id: fcbc678eeb50b0613d9c647e7ac6f2395e2606b2

deletions | additions      

       

\section{Results}  % Fakesubsubsection:We tracked the flow of C from xylose  After adding a nutrient and resource mixture containing  both cellulose and xylose the organic matter amendment  to soil, we tracked the flow of C from xylose or C from cellulose into microbial DNA over time using DNA-SIP (Figure~\ref{fig:setup}). We added 3 milligrams of the nutrient and resource  mixture (as C) per gram dry weight soil to experimental microcosms. This The  amendment comprised 25\% consisted  of total soil C and contained  fresh various  plant biomass components compounds  includingsugars,  cellulose, lignin, and sugars found in hemicellulose,  amino acids. Xylose-C acids,  and cellulose-C made up 0.42 milligrams and 0.88 milligrams per  gram inorganic salts (see Supplemental Methods). The amendment was added  at 2.3 mg C g$^{-1}$ soil  dry soil, respectively, and these additions represented 3.5\% weight (d.w.),  and 7.3\% this comprised 16\%  of the  total C in the soil. The cellulose-C (0.88 mg C g$^{-1}$  soil C, d.w.) and  xylose-C (0.42 mg C g$^{-1}$ soil d.w.) in the amendment comprised 6\% and 3\%  of the total C in the soil,  respectively. The soil microbial community respired 65\% of the xylose within one day (Figure~\ref{fig:13C}) (Figure S1)  and 29\% of the added xylose remained in the soil at day 30 (Figure~\ref{fig:13C}). (Figure S1).  In contrast, cellulose-C declined at a constant rate of approximately 18 $\mu$g C g$^{-1}$ dry d $^{-1}$ g $^{-1}$  soil d$^{-1}$ d.w.  and 40\% of added cellulose-C remained in the soil at day 30 (Figure~\ref{fig:13C}). (Figure S1).  \subsection{Soil microcosm microbial community changes with time}  % Fakesubsubsection:Changes in the soil microcosm microbial community structure  We assessed assimilation of $^{13}$C into microbial DNA by comparing the SSU rRNA gene sequence composition of SIP density gradient fractions fromcontrol treatments or  treatments amended with $^{13}$C-xylose or  $^{13}$C-cellulose. We set up three types of microcosms. including a $^{13}$C label relative to the control treatment.  All microcosms  received treatments used  the same nutrient amendment which included xylose  and resource mixture, but, in two microcosm types  a $^{13}$C-labeled substrate (i.e. cellulose, but  $^{13}$C-xylose or $^{13}$C-cellulose) $^{13}$C-cellulose  was substituted for its unlabeled equivalent. The equivalent in two amendments. A  treatment without isotopically labeled components served as the ``control''. The In the control gradient density fractions  the  majority of the variance in SSU rRNA gene compositionof density gradient fractions from the control treatment  was represented by fraction density (Figure~\ref{fig:ord}). DNA buoyant density correlates with G$+$C content \citep{Buckley_2007} and therefore DNA G$+$C content strongly influences variation in the SSU rRNA gene composition of density gradient fractions. For the $^{13}$C-cellulose treatment, SSU rRNA gene composition in gradient fractions deviated from control at high density ($>$  1.72 ($>$~1.72  g mL$^{-1}$) on days 14 and 30 (Figure~\ref{fig:ord}). For the $^{13}$C-xylose treatment, SSU rRNA gene composition in density gradient fractions also deviated from control in high density fractions, but in contrast to the $^{13}$C-cellulose treatment it deviated from control on days 1, 3, and  7 days~1,~3,~and~7  (Figure~\ref{fig:ord}). SSU rRNA gene composition from $^{13}$C-cellulose treatment and $^{13}$C-xylose treatment density fractions were different differed  at high density indicating different microorganisms assimilated C from xyloseinto DNA  thanthose  C from cellulose (Figure~\ref{fig:ord}). Further, the SSU rRNA gene sequence composition of high density fractions from $^{13}$C-cellulose treatments at days 14 and 30 was similar indicating similar microorganisms had $^{13}$C labeled DNA from in  $^{13}$C-cellulose treatments  at days 14 and 30. In contrast, Contrastingly, in the  $^{13}$C-xylose treatment  the SSU rRNA gene compositionof the  $^{13}$C-xylose treatment  high density gradient fractions varied between days  1, 3, and 7 days~1,~3,~and~7  indicating that different microbes had $^{13}$C labeled DNA on these days. In the $^{13}$C-xylose treatment, the SSU gene composition of high density fractions was similar to control on days 14 and 30 days~14~and~30  (Figure~\ref{fig:ord}) indicating that DNA $^{13}$C was  no longer contained $^{13}$C label  from $^{13}$C-xylose beyond day 14. detectable on these days for this treatment.  \subsection{Temporal dynamics DNA $^{13}$C incorporation of OTUs}  % Fakesubsubsection:We monitored the soil microbial community 

Twenty-nine OTUs exhibited sufficient statistical evidence (adjusted P-value  $<$ 0.10) to conclude they changed in relative abundance over the  course of the experiment. When SSU rRNA gene abundances were combined at  the taxonomic rank of "class", the classes that changed in abundancewith  statistically significant evidence  (P-value $<$ 0.10) were the \textit{Bacilli} (decreased), \textit{Flavobacteria} (decreased), \textit{Gammaproteobacteria} (decreased), and \textit{Herpetosiphonales} (increased) (Figure~\ref{fig:time_class}). Of the 29 OTUs thatsignificantly  changed in relative abundance over time, 14 putatively incorporated $^{13}$C into DNA (Figure~\ref{fig:time}). OTUs that likely  assimilated $^{13}$C from $^{13}$C-cellulose into DNA tended to increase in  relative abundance with time whereas OTUs that assimilated $^{13}$C from 

\subsection{OTUs that assimilated $^{13}$C into DNA} \label{responders}  % Fakesubsubsection:If an OTU exhibited  If an OTU exhibited strong evidence for assimilating  $^{13}$Cincorporation  into DNA, we refer to that OTU as a "responder" (see Supplemental Note 1.7.4 for our operational definition of "responder"). The SSU rRNA gene sequences produced in this study could be distributed into 5,940 OTUs and we assessed the evidence of $^{13}$C incorporation into DNA from $^{13}$C-cellulose and $^{13}$C-xylose for each OTU. Forty-one OTUs responded to $^{13}$C-xylose,  55 OTUs responded to $^{13}$C-cellulose, and 8 OTUs   responded to both xylose and cellulose (Figure~\ref{fig:l2fc}, 

closely related to cultured representatives of the genus \textit{Paenibacillus}  (n $=$ XX, Table~\ref{tab:xyl}). For example, "OTU.57" (Table\ref{tab:xyl}),  annotated as \textit{Paenibacillus}, had a strong signal of $^{13}$C  incorporation assimilation  from $^{13}$C-xylose into DNA at day 1 coinciding with its maximum relative abundance in non-fractionated DNA. The relative abundance of "OTU.57" declined until day 14 and did not appear to be $^{13}$C labeled after day 1 (Figure X). On day 3, \textit{Bacteroidetes} OTUs comprised 63\% of xylose responders (Figure~\ref{fig:xyl_count}) and these OTUs were closely related to cultured representatives of the \textit{Flavobacteriales} and \textit{Sphingobacteriales} (Table~\ref{tab:xyl}). For example, ``OTU.14'',  annotated as a Flavobacterium, had a strong signal for $^{13}$C labeling from in the  $^{13}$C-xylose treatment  at days 1 and 3 coinciding with its maximum relative abundance in non-fractionated DNA. The relative abundance of ``OTU.14'' then declined until day 14 and did not show evidence of $^{13}$C labeling beyond day  3 day~3  (Figure X). Finally, on day 7, day~7,  \textit{Actinobacteria} OTUs represented 53\% of the xylose responders and these OTUs were closely related to cultured representatives of \textit{Micrococcales} (Table~\ref{tab:xyl}). For example,  ``OTU.4'', annotated as \textit{Agromyces}, had signal of $^{13}$C labeling in  the $^{13}$C-xylose treatment  on days 1, 3 and 7 with the strongest evidence of $^{13}$C labeling at day  7 day~7  and did not appear $^{13}$C labeled at days 14 and 30. days~14  and~30.  ``OTU.4'' relative abundance in non-fractionated DNA increased until day 3 day~3  and then declined gradually until day 30 day~30  (Figure X). \textit{Proteobacteria} were also common among xylose responders at day 7 day~7  where they comprised 40\% of xylose responder OTUs. Notably, \textit{Proteobacteria} represented the majority (6 of 8) of OTUs that responded to both cellulose and xylose. %Fakesubsubsection:Cellulose responders were  The phylogenetic composition of cellulose responders did not change with time unlike the phylogenetic composition of  xylose responders. Also, in contrast to xylose responders, cellulose responders often were not closely related ($<$ 95\% 97\%  SSU rRNA gene sequence identity) to cultured isolates. Both the relative abundance and the number of cellulose responders increased over time peaking at days 14 and 30 (Figures~\ref{fig:l2fc}, \ref{fig:rspndr_count}, and \ref{fig:babund}). Cellulose responders belonged to the \textit{Proteobacteria} (46\%), \textit{Verrucomicrobia} (16\%), \textit{Planctomycetes} (16\%), \textit{Chloroflexi} (8\%), \textit{Bacteroidetes} (8\%), \textit{Actinobacteria} (3\%), and \textit{Melainabacteria} (1 OTU) (Table~\ref{tab:cell}). The majority (86\%) of cellulose responders in the \textit{Proteobacteria} were closely related ($>$ 97\% identity) to bacteria already cultured in isolation, including representatives of the genera: \textit{Cellvibrio}, \textit{Devosia}, \textit{Rhizobium}, and \textit{Sorangium}, which are all known for their ability to degrade cellulose (Table~\ref{tab:cell}). Proteobacterial cellulose responders belonged to \textit{Alpha-} (13 OTUs), (13~OTUs),  \textit{Beta-} (4 OTUs), (4~OTUs),  \textit{Gamma-} (5 OTUs), (5~OTUs),  and \textit{Deltaproteobacteria} (6 OTUs). (6~OTUs).  % Fakesubsubsection:The majority (85\%) of cellulose  The majority (85\%) of cellulose responders outside of the 

sequence identity to any characterized isolate. The \textit{Spartobacteria} OTU  ``OTU.2192'' exemplified many cellulose responders (Figure X). ``OTU.2192''  gradually increased in non-fractionated DNA relative abundance with time and  evidence for $^{13}$C labeling of ``OTU.2192'' from in the  $^{13}$C-cellulose treatment  increased gradually over time with the strongest evidence at days 14 and  30 days~14  and~30  (Figure X). \textit{Choloflexi} cellulose responders predominantly belonged to an unidentified clade within the \textit{Herpetosiphonales} and these they  shared $<$ 89\% SSU rRNA gene sequence identity to any characterized isolate. Characteristic ofother  \textit{Chloroflexi} cellulose responders, "OTU.64" increased in relative abundance over 30 days and evidence for $^{13}$C labeling of ``OTU.64'' in the $^{13}$C-cellulose treatment  peaked days 14 and 30 (Figure X). Cellulose responders found within the \textit{Bacteroidetes} fell within the \textit{Cytophagales} contrasting with \textit{Bacteroidetes} xylose responders that fell instead within the \textit{Flavobacteria} or \textit{Sphingobacteriales}. \textit{Bacteroidetes} cellulose responders  included one OTU that shared 100\% SSU rRNA gene sequence identity to species of \textit{Sporocytophaga}, a genus that includes known cellulose degraders. \subsection{Characteristics of cellulose and xylose responders}  % Fakesubsubsection:Cellulose responders tended  Cellulose responders, relative to xylose responders, tended to have lower  relative abundance in non-fractionated DNA, demonstrated signal consistent with higher atom \%  $^{13}$C incorporation per unit DNA upon $^{13}$C labeling, in labeled DNA,  and have lower estimated \textit{rrn} copy number. In the non-fractionated DNA, cellulose responders had lower relative abundance (7e$^{-4}$ (s.d. 2e$^{-3}$)) than xylose responders (2e$^{-3}$ (s.d. 4e$^{-3}$)) (Figure~\ref{fig:xyl_count}, P-value $=$ 0.00028, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test). Six of the ten most common OTUs observed in the non-fractionated DNA responded to xylose, and, eight of the ten most abundant responders to xylose or cellulose in the non-fractionated DNA were xylose responders. However, xylose and cellulose responders included OTUs at both high and low abundance (Figure~\ref{fig:shift}).  % Fakesubsubsection:DNA buoyant density increases as the amount  DNA buoyant density (BD)  increases as in proportion to the atom \% $^{13}$C of the  DNA.  Hence,  the amount extent  of $^{13}$C per unit incorporation into  DNA increases. can be evaluated as the  change in BD in enriched treatments relative to control. We calculated for each  OTU its mean BD weighted by relative abundance to determine its “center of  mass” within a given density gradient. We then quantified for each OTU the  difference in center of mass between control gradients and gradients from  13C-xylose or 13C-cellulose treatments (see supplemental methods for the  detailed calculation).  Therefore, the amount of $^{13}$C per unit DNA can be evaluated by the change  in DNA buoyant density (BD) upon $^{13}$C labeling. In this study, we found the  density weighted average for each OTU in each gradient (i.e. mean density 

of an OTU's relative abundance profile across a density gradient. We then  quantified the difference in each OTU's center of mass between control  gradients and corresponding $^{13}$C labeled gradients (see supplemental  methods for the detailed calculation). We refer to the change in center of mass position for an OTU in response to $^{13}$C labeling as $\Delta\hat{BD}$. $\Delta\hat{BD}$ can indicate be used to compare  relative  differences in $^{13}$C incorporation per unit  DNA labeling  between OTUs although it does OTUs. $\Delta\hat{BD}$  values, however, are  not represent directly comparable to  the true density shift BD changes observed  for an  OTU DNA  from pure cultures which generate uniformly isotopically labeled molecules,  in part because it $\Delta\hat{BD}$  is based on relative abundance in density  gradient fractions (and not DNA concentration)  and in part because all members of an OTU may not responding identically uniformly respond  to the isotopic label.$\Delta\hat{BD}$ is therefore not directly comparable to literature values for  DNA density shifts due to isotopic labeling.  Cellulose responder $\Delta\hat{BD}$ (0.0163 g mL$^{-1}$ (s.d. 0.0094)) (s.d.~0.0094))  was greater than that of xylose responders (0.0097 g mL$^{-1}$ (s.d. 0.0094)) (s.d.~0.0094))  (Figure~\ref{fig:shift}, P-value $=$ 1.8610e$^{-6}$, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test).   % Fakesubsubsection:We predicted the rrn 

overall phylogenetic clustering with a corresponding P-value of 0.05  \citep{Evans2014a}. The consenTRAIT metric is a measure of the average clade  depth for a trait in a phylogenetic tree. NRI values indicate that cellulose  responders clustered phylogenetically (NRI: 4.49) while xylose responders are  overdispersed although statistical support for xylose responder  overdispersion is not strong (NRI: -1.33). NTI values show that both cellulose overall  andxylose responders clustered  at the tips of the phylogeny (NTI: 1.43 and  2.69, respectively). (NRI:~4.49,  NTI:~1.43) while xylose responders cluster terminally (NRI:~-1.33, NTI:~2.69).  The consenTRAIT clade depth for xylose and cellulose responders was 0.012 and 0.028 was~0.012  and~0.028  SSU rRNA gene sequence dissimilarity, respectively. As reference, the average clade depth is 0.017 SSU rRNA gene sequence dissimilarity for arabinose utilization (another five C sugar found in hemicellulose) and was 0.013 and 0.034 was~0.013  and~0.034  SSU rRNA gene sequence dissimilarity for glucosidase and cellulase activity of isolates in culture, respectively \citep{Martiny2013,Berlemont2013}. These results indicate xylose responders  form terminal clusters dispersed throughout the phylogeny while cellulose  responders form deep clades of terminally clustered OTUs.