Chuck figure caption changes  over 9 years ago

Commit id: d59d820334301d7c01b77c5d336241e849b39062

deletions | additions      

       

\textbf{Figure 2.} Log$_{2}$ fold change of \textsuperscript{13}C-responders $^{13}$C-responders  in cellulose treatment (top) and xylose treatment (bottom). Log$_{2}$ fold change is based on the relative abundance in the experimental treatment compared to the control within the density range 1.7125-1.755 g ml\textsuperscript{-1}. ml$^{-1}$.  Taxa are colored by phylum. 'Counts' is a histogram of number of sequences for each log$_{2}$ fold change value.        

\textbf{Figure 1.} NMDS analysis from weighted unifrac distances of 454 sequence data from SIP fractions of each treatment over time. Twenty fractions from a CsCl gradient fractionation for each treatment at each time point were sequenced (Fig. S1). Each point on the NMDS represents the bacterial composition based on 16S sequencing for a single fraction where the size of the point is representative of the density of that fraction and the colors represent the treatments (A) or days (B).        

\textbf{Figure 3.} \textsuperscript{13}C-responder $^{13}$C-responder  characteristics based on density shift (A) and rank (B). Kernel density estimation of \textsuperscript{13}C-responder's $^{13}$C-responder's  density shift in cellulose treatment (blue) and xylose treatment (green) demonstrates degree of labeling for responders for each respective substrate. \textsuperscript{13}C-responders $^{13}$C-responders  in rank abundance are labeled by substrate (cellulose, blue; xylose, green) and the phylum which it belongs to.