this is for holding javascript data
Chuck Pepe-Ranney deleted bulk_rspndr_abund.tex
over 9 years ago
Commit id: 13a11ee623a45eb8f0bcb44c71771f18260613a6
deletions | additions
diff --git a/bulk_rspndr_abund.tex b/bulk_rspndr_abund.tex
deleted file mode 100644
index 4638e23..0000000
--- a/bulk_rspndr_abund.tex
+++ /dev/null
...
\subsection{Xylose responders are more abundant members of the soil community
than cellulose responders}
$^{13}$C-xylose responders are generally more abundant members based on
relative abundance in bulk DNA SSU rRNA gene content than $^{13}$C-cellulose
responders (Figure~\ref{fig:shift}, p-value 0.00028). However, both abundant
and rare OTUs responded to $^{13}$C-xylose and $^{13}$C-cellulose
(Figure~\ref{fig:shift}). For instance, a \textit{Delftia} $^{13}$C-cellulose
responder is fairly abundant in the bulk samples (``OTU.5'',
Table~\ref{tab:cell}). OTU.5 was on average the 13th most abundant OTU in bulk
samples. A $^{13}$C-xylose responder (``OTU.1040'', Table~\ref{tab:xyl}) has a
mean relative abundance in bulk samples of 3.57e$^{-05}$. Two
$^{13}$C-cellulose responders wer not found in any bulk samples ("OTU.862" and
"OTU.1312", Table~\ref{tab:cell}). Of the 10 most abundant responders 8 are
$^{13}$C-xylose responders and 6 of these 8 are consistently among the 10 most
abundant OTUs in bulk samples.
Responder abundances summed at phylum level generally increased for
$^{13}$C-cellulose (Figure~XX) whereas $^{13}$C-xylose responder abundances
summed at the phylum level decreased over time for \textit{Firmicutes},
\textit{Bacteroidetes}, \textit{Actinobacteria} and \textit{Proteobacteria}
although \textit{Proteobacteria} spiked at day 14 (Figure~\ref{fig:babund}).
Bulk abundance trends are roughly consistent with $^{13}$C assimilation
activity.
diff --git a/layout.md b/layout.md
index dd0cf6f..76d9d2f 100644
--- a/layout.md
+++ b/layout.md
...
Significance.tex
Introduction.tex
Results.tex
bulk_rspndr_abund.tex
BD.tex
rrn.tex
Discussion.tex