It is evident in this paper that the description of the universe like a spacetime field doesn’t oppose to the actual model of the universe. Rather it tries to resolve some problems leading the way toward new horizons about the birth and the evolution of the universe.
Using this new approach we have tried to face the fundamental problem of the expansion of the universe, explaining it as creation of space. The idea which sees the mass as generating of space completes the theory of the general relativity: the mass acts on the whole space, because the mass curves and produces it. Besides the mass-space equivalence introduces a variable metric universe, that clarifies some cosmological problem not still resolved:
the problem of the expansion of the universe described only mathematically and not physically by scale parameter \(a(t)\) associated to galactic distances;
the dark mass problem;
the accelerated expansion of the universe explained with the dark energy;
the problem of the flat universe.
The thesis proposed in this innovative cosmological theory are remarkable:
the physical explanation of the expansion as the effect of a creation of space;
the implication that the creation of mass generates space, or the equivalence between mass and space;
the existence of a background \(\Theta\) which exchanges mass-energy with the universe;
the acceleration of galaxies is a consequence both of the previous phase with open metric both of the pressure derived from the flow of mass-space in the background lattice \(\Xi^0\) (more adherence to the observational data in galaxies near and far);
the Einstein’s cosmological parameter cosmological \(\Lambda\) proceeds directly from the pressure of the incoming space flow into the universe;
the missing mass is located in \(\Xi\);
the dark energy is identified in the flow of half-quanta from \(\Theta\) to the universe \(U\);
it is admitted the possibility that after the flat metric phase the universe will pass to a closed metric phase determining a slowdown in the expansion up to a stop.
To obtain therefore a variable metric universe one must assume the existence of a flow of half-quanta from \(\Theta\) to the universe.
Let us consider then possible an emptying of the energy of \(\Theta\) until the universe reaches a “saturation” during the closed metric phase with a consequent deadlock of the expansion: since that moment a collapse phase will begin. Only in the final phase of the collapse, the matter, due to the external pressure, will decompose in its uncoulped sub-oscillators, in this way rebuilding the backgorund \(\Theta\).
We believe then that when \(Θ\) is full the described cycle again: the hlaf-quanta restart to flow in \(U\), taking back the succession of the phases: open, flat and closed.
We call this universe as cyclical universe.
We ask us where it happens the transfer of mass-energy flow from \(\Theta\) to \(U\). A reasonable theses could be that the black holes are doors for the energy coming from \(\Theta\). The nucleus of a black hole could have a structure of uncoupled sub-oscillators; so the black hole could dismember the particles, uncoupling the IQuO’s chains. In this way the sub-oscillators could introduce themselves in the nucleus of the black hole coupling whit the sub-oscillators existing in it. So, chains of coupled sub-oscillators would form into the black hole that could create a lattice if IQuO’s chains whose \(\lambda\) could be equal or greater of the Schwarzschild’s radius, allowing to the quantum to escape from the black hole and to penetrate into the universe.
Indipendently by any objection about this cosmological model, we can we can confidently reaffirm the belief that we could never fully explain the various cosmological discoveries without a universe in which space and time, together with the particles (fields) that describe it, simply are different constituents of a single, huge physical object, whose intrinsic nature is certainly something that we have always defined as spacetime.