deletions | additions       diff --git a/UNid.tex b/UNid.tex  index 369040b..62b1a5d 100644  --- a/UNid.tex  +++ b/UNid.tex 
...
\subsection{Unid0523-2530}  Acreo et al found only a dim X-ray source on the 2FGL field and non-detection in UV.  In radsio radio  the X-ray counter part was detected only in the lowest radio frequency. $\gamma$, X-ray, radio data might suggest a pulsar origin.  EF $i > $21.8mag (9-11-2013)\\ 
...
2013-01-21T02:00 R 60 ALwa200130\\  2014-01-14 R,i attempt, ALxa140180 thick clouds\\  \subsection{UNid1036-6722}  Do we have any NTT or GMOS data??\\  Acero et al:\\  Only two marginal X-ray sources, although extensively observed (35.5 ksec instead ot   the "normal" $\sim$ 4 ksec).  Marginal UV detection as well, not good enough detectyion for variability.\\  Radio detection only for D1 (5.5GHz), indicating steep radio spectrum and   no WISE detection. This is a pulsar candidate.  \subsection{1129+3758E1}  Next: take SDSS data (ugriz?) as this is an SDSS-field. 
...
2) get radio flux (and X-ray ?) to get the spectral indices (radio-optial-Xray)\\  \subsection{UNid1231-5112}  Do we have any NTT or GMOS data?\\  Acero et al:\\  Three X-ray sources are detected in the error ellipse (F1,F2,F3).\\  F1 is a hard source, while F2 and F3 are soft. F1 and F2 have   dim optical counter part and F3 is a bright star.  This is the only $\gamma$ ray source (of the Acero sample) which had no radio   source with an upper limit of 10mJy at 5.5 and 9 GHz.  The LAT proerties are not quite as for a typical pulsar, however   the multi wavelenght proerties are not like AGN either.  \subsection{UNidJ1844+1546}  Next:\\