Tapio Pursimo edited UNid.tex  almost 10 years ago

Commit id: 1124b82f7abfe331ad11a1efd742a32ece59b027

deletions | additions      

       

(Roopesh, are the A2 A3 radio detections real?). Petrov et al (2013) detected this (these?) in radio as well.\\  A1 is a blazar candidate as it has flat radio sepctrum SED like a blazar SED and   based on Massaro et al (2013) WISE data this is a BL Lac candidate.   This source is WISE detected.\\  Photometry:\\  Little variability based on three (GSC2.3, USNO-A2, USNO-B1) sky surveys.   Typical B$\sim$ 17.7 , (however USNO-B1 B2=18.48), R$\sim$16.7-17.0. 

Next:\\  Estimate radio-optical-Xray spectral indices (or flux ratios)\\    This source is not WISE detected.\\  Data:\\   08-11-2013 i 120+300+300 ALwk070141,4,5 thin clouds?\\   $i >$ 21.8 mag (6.1 arcsec NE from a star)\\  

from the above coordinates (uncomoftably far away). Both of these have GSC2.3 magnitudes  F=20.17 and 20.64, respectively. \\  This source is WISE detected.\\  The archival data for c1 is:\\  GSC J=21.41 F=20.17 N=18.78\\  USNO-B1 B2=18.75 R2=19.60\\ 

EW about 15\AA or more.  The width of the broad lineas are between 1000 and 2000 km/s, suggesting NLSy1 spectral calssification.    This source is WISE detected.\\    \textbf{Photometry, data:}\\   \textbf{Photometry} 2013-06-02T20:46 R 30x3+90+180 ALwf020154\\  

it is an EF in GSC2.3 and there are three faint features (F=19.76, 19.92 and F=19.94)  withinn one arc min radius from the coordinates with R(wa20) 19.92, 19.92 and 19.95.  This source is not WISE detected.\\  2013-01-21T02:00 R 60 ALwa200130\\   s2 R=19.7  

Radio detection only for D1 (5.5GHz), indicating steep radio spectrum and   no WISE detection. This is a pulsar candidate.     This source is not WISE detected.\\  NTT R-band 200 sec EFOSC_Image365_0003     

"tgt - comparison star" ( 5.66, 5.9 , 5.99) vs  "Comparison star - Check star" (-0.58, -0.58, -0.57).  This source is WISE detected.\\  Data:\\ 

If this is a typical QSO the expected R-magnitude will be about 23.6,  V$\sim$24.1 and B$\sim$ 24.3  This source is not WISE detected.\\  Data in detail:\\   

2) get radio flux (and X-ray ?) to get the spectral indices (radio-optial-Xray)\\      \subsection{UNid1231-5112} Do we have any NTT or GMOS data?\\   Acero et al:\\  Three X-ray sources are detected in the error ellipse (F1,F2,F3).\\  

source with an upper limit of 10mJy at 5.5 and 9 GHz. The LAT proerties are not quite as for a typical pulsar,   however the multi wavelenght proerties are not like AGN either.  This source is not WISE detected.\\  NTT R$\sim$19.5 mag (raw frame)\\  NTT EFOSC_Image365_0004 R 100 sec F1\\ 

GMOS spectrum, no lines BL LAC?\\  This source is not WISE detected.\\  GMOS 20130728 R400/725.0 1.0arcsec 800.0 \\  NTT EFOSC\_Image001\_0001 R 180 sec\\ 

low energy peaked BL Lacs (classically radio selected BL Lacs).      This source is WISE detected.\\  \textbf{Photometry}\\   Background:\\   there is a star 2.8" W from the tgt (R $\sim$ 19.9)\\.