this is for holding javascript data
wendylyn edited existing work.tex
over 10 years ago
Commit id: 81dae2d77fe3bad9ef32a2585c55564484b8c53b
deletions | additions
diff --git a/existing work.tex b/existing work.tex
index 711a48c..827b783 100644
--- a/existing work.tex
+++ b/existing work.tex
...
\section{Existing Work}
To ~~To address the problem of congestion in datacenter, there are mainly two types of work.
The ~~The first one is implicit congestion control by using ECN to forecast buffer overflow in switch/router, e.g. DCTCP \cite{bhakar_Sengupta_Sridharan_2010} and D2TCP \cite{Vamanan_Hasan_Vijaykumar_2012}. These works are well-compatible with current devices. However modifying the size of slide windows smoothly needs more than a several RTTs of time. This seemly short period of time is actually to the small flows.
Another ~~Another type of approaches are explicit flow control in switch/router, e.g. D3\cite{llani_Karagiannis_Rowtron_2011}, PDQ\cite{Hong_Caesar_Godfrey_2012}, pFabric \cite{McKeown_Prabhakar_Shenker_2013}. Though the design can be much easier, and simulation results seem great, it is hard to implement into real world, because they need hardware changes such as special-designed switch/router. The table below shows the comparison of 5 approaches in five metrics.
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}