deletions | additions       diff --git a/layout.md b/layout.md  index 0bc22c4..9525a89 100644  --- a/layout.md  +++ b/layout.md 
...
scattering part2.tex  scattering part3.tex  figures/scattering_timescales2/scattering_timescales2.png  scat5.tex  scattering part4.tex  figures/limiting_dm_200ns_resolution/limiting_dm_200ns_resolution.png  scattering part5.tex  diff --git a/scat5.tex b/scat5.tex  deleted file mode 100644  index 5a8e8a8..0000000  --- a/scat5.tex  +++ /dev/null 
...
All of the above discussion on scattering timescales would seem to suggest that the best-case scattering time could be taken into account when addressing requirements SKA1-SYS\_REQ-2961 and SKA1-SYS\_REQ-2962. However, there are reasons why we may wish to resolve the scattering tail of a given pulsar and so somewhat arbitrarily imposing a time resolution limit based on scattering is viewed as undesirable. This being said, we do not want requirements that imply extremely computationally expensive operational modes and as such a limit must be determined on the minimum time resolution as a function of DM. In the next section we will attempt to provide such a limit based on keeping the computational cost of coherent dedispersion to a reasonable level.