this is for holding javascript data
Ewan D. Barr deleted scattering part2.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 0dac3c950928f54f7810459902d4f6b7141d44cb
deletions | additions
diff --git a/layout.md b/layout.md
index 2386a0d..340defb 100644
--- a/layout.md
+++ b/layout.md
...
figures/PulseSpectra/PulseSpectra.png
minres2.tex
Scattering times.tex
scattering part2.tex
scattering part4.tex
PeriodLimir.tex
figures/MaximumDMvsP6/MaximumDMvsP6.png
diff --git a/scattering part2.tex b/scattering part2.tex
deleted file mode 100644
index 64b474a..0000000
--- a/scattering part2.tex
+++ /dev/null
...
The scattering timescale is roughly related to the observing frequency, $\nu$, and distance between pulsar and observer, $D$, by
\begin{equation}
\tau_s \propto \frac{D^2}{\nu^\alpha}
\end{equation}
where $\alpha$ depends on the structure of turbulence in the ISM and is approximated as $\alpha \sim 4$.
The scattering timescale can also be expressed in terms of dispersion measure (DM). Here we will use the empirical model of \citet{Bhat_2004}, that relates $\tau_s$ to DM via
\begin{equation}
\log_{10} \tau_s(\nu,{\rm DM}) = -9.46 + 0.154 \log_{10} {\rm DM}+ 1.07 (\log_{10} {\rm DM})^2 - 3.86 \log_{10}{\nu},
\end{equation}
where $\tau_s$ is the scattering time in seconds and $\nu$ is the observing frequency in GHz. The scatter of measured values about this relationship has a standard deviation of several orders of magnitude. In the remainder of this document we take a conservative approach and assume that the scattering timescale is 4 orders of magnitude smaller than suggested by the above relation, i.e. the best-case scattering ($\tau_{s_{\rm best}}$) is given by
\begin{equation}
\label{eqn:best_case_scattering}
\log_{10} \tau_{s_{\rm best}}(\nu,{\rm DM}) = \log_{10} \tau_s(\nu,{\rm DM}) - 4.
\end{equation}
The point at which the scattering timescale exceeds the timescale implied by new versions of SKA1-SYS\_REQ-2961 and SKA1-SYS\_REQ-2962 (see above) ultimately determines the maximum DM for which the SKA1 pulsar timing instrumentation must support phase-coherent dispersion removal. Beyond this DM, the computational cost of coherent dedispersion can be decreased by trading time resolution for frequency resolution.