deletions | additions       diff --git a/reconstructed_wedges.tex b/reconstructed_wedges.tex  index bfbc16e..e73b168 100644  --- a/reconstructed_wedges.tex  +++ b/reconstructed_wedges.tex 
...
Here we examine implications of the reconstruction technique on the WiggleZ anistorpic baryonic signature.   Figure \ref{fig:z60_model_figure} displays our results for the clustering wedges $\xi_{||}$ (line-of-sight) (line-of-sight; red circles)  and $\xi_{\perp}$ (transverse) (transverse; blue circles)  in the three redshift ranges investigated $\Delta z^{\rm Near}$, $\Delta z^{\rm Mid}$ and $\Delta z^{\rm Far}$. Far}$ with best fit models of $\chi^2=?, \ ?, \ 34.4$ with 36 dof, respectively.  We clearly see baroynic acoustic signatures both in the line-of-sight $\xi$ (red circles) $\xi_{\perp}$  and in the transverse signal (blue circles). The best fit model is displayed which corresponds to a fit of $\chi^2=34.4$ with 36 dof. $\xi_{||}$.  The reason that there is no apparent gap as in the pre-reconstruction case, is that the reconstruction procedure corrects for the Kaiser-effect (cite Kaiser) by estimating the rate of growth of structure $f$ in Equation (refer to equation). Quantification of the significance of detection ...