Eyal Kazin edited reconstructed_wedges.tex  almost 10 years ago

Commit id: 1704de0acdbf2f3f0ea97fefd7e9bae9d9418311

deletions | additions      

       

Figures \ref{fig:HDA_z60_epsilon0.15}-\ref{fig:HDA_z26_epsilon0.15} display the obtained posteriors of $cz/H/r_{\rm s}$ and $D_{\rm A}/r_{\rm s}$ marginazlied to 2D and 1D. In the 2D panels the even contour solid red lines are the 68, 95\% confidence level regions, and we add a Gaussian approximation in each panel based on the mode values, the median values of the 68\% CL region widths and the covariance $r$ between the two parameters. It is apparent that the BAO-only analysis of the $\Delta z^{\rm Far}$ and $\Delta z^{\rm Mid}$ samples yield moderate constraints on these parameters and $\Delta z^{\rm Near}$ does not.  %============================================================  \begin{table}  \label{tab:hda_reconstructed_wigglez}  \caption{Caption for table!}  \begin{tabular}{ l | c | r }  \hline  first & second & third \\  \hline  1 & 2 & 3 \\  4 & 5 & 6 \\  7 & 8 & 9 \\  \end{tabular}  \medskip  comments for table  \end{table}  %============================================================  We clearly see that the 1$\sigma$ CL region engulfs the fiducial value use for analysis. The 2$\sigma$ region is ill-constrained.