this is for holding javascript data
Eyal Kazin edited reconstructed_wedges.tex
almost 10 years ago
Commit id: 1704de0acdbf2f3f0ea97fefd7e9bae9d9418311
deletions | additions
diff --git a/reconstructed_wedges.tex b/reconstructed_wedges.tex
index dfbaf17..90808ab 100644
--- a/reconstructed_wedges.tex
+++ b/reconstructed_wedges.tex
...
Figures \ref{fig:HDA_z60_epsilon0.15}-\ref{fig:HDA_z26_epsilon0.15} display the obtained posteriors of $cz/H/r_{\rm s}$ and $D_{\rm A}/r_{\rm s}$ marginazlied to 2D and 1D. In the 2D panels the even contour solid red lines are the 68, 95\% confidence level regions, and we add a Gaussian approximation in each panel based on the mode values, the median values of the 68\% CL region widths and the covariance $r$ between the two parameters. It is apparent that the BAO-only analysis of the $\Delta z^{\rm Far}$ and $\Delta z^{\rm Mid}$ samples yield moderate constraints on these parameters and $\Delta z^{\rm Near}$ does not.
%============================================================
\begin{table}
\label{tab:hda_reconstructed_wigglez}
\caption{Caption for table!}
\begin{tabular}{ l | c | r }
\hline
first & second & third \\
\hline
1 & 2 & 3 \\
4 & 5 & 6 \\
7 & 8 & 9 \\
\end{tabular}
\medskip
comments for table
\end{table}
%============================================================
We clearly see that the 1$\sigma$ CL region engulfs the fiducial value use for analysis. The 2$\sigma$ region is ill-constrained.