Demian Arancibia edited untitled.tex  almost 9 years ago

Commit id: f085165b31cf3f9232df52feaa7e6eae8fa66dc5

deletions | additions      

       

\documentclass{article}  \usepackage{amsmath}  \usepackage{biblatex}  \usepackage{mathtools}  \begin{document}  \section{Overview}  This document presents a parametric model to help design an Interferometric Array. It describes the relationship of design parameters in section 2 with performance objectives in section 3.   In particular, this document provides a an explanation of the parameters and objectives selection. These explanations enable the reader to both assess completeness of the model, and accuracy of the mathematical relationships as well. 

\subsubsection{Cost of Data Transmission Network Construction}  \subsubsection{Cost of Antennas Construction}  A commonly used rule of thumb for the cost of an antenna is that it is proportional to $D^{\alpha}$, where $\alpha \approx 2.7$ for values of $D$ from a few meters to tens of meters. (\citet*{moran})  \subsubsection{Cost of Antenna Electronics}  \subsubsection{Cost of Re-configuration Systems Construction}  \section{Array Performance Data Generation - Python Implementation}  \section{Visualization Tool Notes}  \section{Conversation notes}  \subsection{Engineering cost vs. Calibration cost}  Tricky because you can compensate antenna quality with software. So the equations must capture this trade off. \end{document}