this is for holding javascript data
Demian Arancibia edited untitled.tex
almost 9 years ago
Commit id: 80ecfe6c04033a2524a60e16167ee916589ba995
deletions | additions
diff --git a/untitled.tex b/untitled.tex
index d884feb..f75daac 100644
--- a/untitled.tex
+++ b/untitled.tex
...
This section aims to include array performance objectives that might be influenced by design variables in \S~\ref{sec:var}.
\subsection{Fourier Plane Coverage}
As derived in \cite{design}, the antenna diameter determines its beam size $\theta_{ant} \approx \frac{\lambda}{D}$. If the plane area $\frac{B}{\lambda}$ is divided in cells of size $\frac{D}{\lambda}$ then
\begin{equation}\label{eq:correlator_efficiency} \begin{equation}\label{eq:fourier}
\eta_c(t_{int}) = \frac{\text{correlator sensitivity}}{\text{sesitivity of a perfect analog correlator having the same } t_{int}}
\end{equation}
\subsection{Point Source Sensitivity}
...
\section{Visualization Tool Notes}
\section{Conversation notes}
\subsection{Engineering cost vs. Calibration cost}
Tricky because you can compensate antenna quality with software. So the equations must capture this trade off.