this is for holding javascript data
Demian Arancibia edited untitled.tex
almost 9 years ago
Commit id: 07a23cf434bcbe957ab9d9dfe8e6375efb06c8a7
deletions | additions
diff --git a/untitled.tex b/untitled.tex
index ba973ed..3daef5c 100644
--- a/untitled.tex
+++ b/untitled.tex
...
\subsubsection{Collecting Area}
\subsection{Pad Aspects}
\subsubsection{Quantity}
In case re-configuration of the array is envisioned, there might be a bigger number of pads ready for aperture connection to the system.
\subsubsection{Position}
The challengue of positions has been addressed in x, y and z.
\subsection{Receiver Aspects}
\subsubsection{Bandwidth}
\subsubsection{Temperature}
...
\subsubsection{Efficiency}
\section{Objectives}\label{sec:obj}
This section aims to include array performance objectives that might be influenced by design variables in \S~\ref{sec:var}.
\subsection{Minimize Brightness \subsection{Brightness Sensitivity Limit}
An overall measure of performance is the System Equivalent Flux Density, $SEFD$, defined as the flux density of a source that would deliver the same amount of power (see \cite{sensitivity2}):
\begin{equation}\label{eq:system_equivalent_flux_density}
SEFD = {\frac{T_{sys}}{\frac{\eta_a A}{2k_B}}}
...
\Delta I_m = {\frac{1}{\eta_s }}{\frac{SEFD}{\sqrt{(N(N-1) \Delta \nu t_{int}}}}
\end{equation}
in units of Janskys per synthesized beam area with $\eta_s$ most important factor being correlator efficiency $\eta_c = \frac{\text{correlator sensitivity}}{\text{sesitivity of a perfect analog correlator having the same } t_{int}}$ (see \cite{sensitivity}).
\subsection{}
\subsection{Operations Costs}
\subsubsection{Components reliability}
\subsubsection{Maintenance complexity}
...