deletions | additions       diff --git a/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex b/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex  index bd5f1ad..756e6b9 100644  --- a/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex  +++ b/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex 
...
Although experimental values have considerable vertical spread,   our calculated stopping power is on the low side for most of the points and also below the fitted by \textsc{Srim} model \cite{Ziegler_2010}.  While this was partially explained by taking into account off-channeling trajectories near the peak, there are possible intrinsic limitations of the approximations to the density functional  theory used. Along this line we would like to note that more sophisticated approaches,  based on the dielectric and current-density response but including  the exact many-body and dynamic exchange-correlation  treatment, are available in the literature \cite{Nazarov_2007}.   These types This type  of advanced approaches which are beyond the current scope of this work contain explicitly additional channels of dissipation not taken into account   in our adiabatic exchange and correlation functionals, which can be relatively important.  Given the aforementioned limitations of the orbital based method and the exchange and correlation used it