deletions | additions       diff --git a/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex b/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex  index 6795a1c..abd43b1 100644  --- a/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex  +++ b/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex 
...
Fig. \ref{fig:stopping_power} shows a comparison of our calculated $S_\text{e}$ with \textsc{Srim} experimental data and model.   In the channeling case, when the incident velocity $v$ increases after the maximum stopping is reached, the rate of decrease of our $S_\text{e}$ results becomes rather is  faster than those obtained by either the experimental or the \textsc{Srim} database. For the off-channeling case, there is a better agreement between our $S_\text{e}$ results with the \textsc{Srim} data in most of the range.   In experiments, where trajectories are not necessarily finely controlled, the projectile does indeed explore core regions of the host atoms, and that is presumably why off-channeling simulations are a better representation for the most common experiments \cite{Dorado_1993}.