this is for holding javascript data
Edwin E. Quashie edited At_low_velocity_our_results__.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: bd93bb73c8e699b1bf9d5e573a229254bcaf320e
deletions | additions
diff --git a/At_low_velocity_our_results__.tex b/At_low_velocity_our_results__.tex
index 843b099..261563b 100644
--- a/At_low_velocity_our_results__.tex
+++ b/At_low_velocity_our_results__.tex
...
At low velocity, our results show good agreement with
Markin those of
Markin \emph{et al.} \cite{Markin_2009} but a relative disagreement with the findings of Cantero \emph{et al.} \cite{Cantero_2009} and the \textsc{Srim} model.
This could be a simple experimental scaling issue related to the difference between measuring relative and absolute stopping power at low velocities \cite{Markin_2009}.
Below $0.02~\mathrm{a.u.}$, the lack of experimental points preclude a direct comparison, but we find a large deviation from linear behavior, one possible explanation is that bound effects break down the linear response (Linhard) approximation that was useful to interpret the different regimes and crossover at $v > 0.02~\mathrm{a.u.}$.
Probing this regime experimentally would be difficult, specially to disentangle it from nuclear stopping effects, but this is confirmed that would be an unexpected new result. In any case, the combination of experimental and theoretical result shows that the limit $v\to 0$ is intricate for metals as it is for insulators \cite{Artacho_2007, Lim_2015}.
%