deletions | additions       diff --git a/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex b/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex  index f44a135..e5cc561 100644  --- a/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex  +++ b/Fig_ref_fig_stopping_power_shows__.tex 
...
based on the dielectric and current-density response but including  the exact many-body and dynamic exchange-correlation  treatment, are available in the literature \cite{Nazarov_2007}.   These types of advanced approaches, approaches  which are beyond the current scope of this work, work  contain explicitly additional channels of dissipation not taken into account   in our adiabatic exchange and correlation functionals that functionals, which  can be relatively important. Given the aforementioned limitations of the orbital based method and the exchange and correlation used it   is still reassuring to see agreement up to a few times the velocity of the maximum stopping.  We also see that at low velocity the off-channeling and channeling simulated points collapses to results collapse into  a common curve, this effect has been seen in the simulations before \cite{Correa_2012,Schleife_2015,Ullah_2015},   at low velocity the effect is less sensitive to the precise geometry of the trajectory,  as the geometric cross section increases.