Edwin E. Quashie edited Even_today_the_inclusion_of__.tex  over 8 years ago

Commit id: 64e66845ca4aa5bdce1c4e80b61e8b9056f24809

deletions | additions      

       

%  %It is an attractive method because it is both self-consistency and non-perturbative \cite{Kohn_1965} allowing for an atomistic \emph{ab initio} description at a reasonable computational cost for simulation cells below a few hundred atoms. Alternatively, time dependent tight-binding have been proposed as well to overcome some size limitations \cite{Mason_2012} at the price of additional approximations.  In studying the role of ion-solid interactions in $\mathrm{H^+ + Al}$, Correa \emph{et al.} \cite{Correa_2012} have shown that the electronic excitations affects the interatomic forces relative to the adiabatic outcome. Recently Schleife \emph{et al.} \cite{Schleife_2015} have calculated the electronic stopping $S_\text{e}$ power ($S_\text{e}$)  by $\mathrm{H}$ and $\mathrm{He}$ projectile including TDDFT non-adiabatic electron dynamics and found that off-channeling trajectories along with the inclusion of semicore electrons enhance $S_\text{e}$ resulting in better agreement with the \textsc{Srim} data \cite{Ziegler_2010}.   \textsc{Srim} \cite{Ziegler_2010} also provides both a fitted model for electronic stopping as well as a large set of experimental points.  In this case we concentrate in a metal with a richer electronic band structure around the Fermi energy, such as $\mathrm{Cu}$.