this is for holding javascript data
Chuck Pepe-Ranney edited Discussion.tex
almost 10 years ago
Commit id: af2b8db7afee6525634d749656f04f34cdee8797
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Discussion.tex b/Discussion.tex
index 463386a..6adc0ca 100644
--- a/Discussion.tex
+++ b/Discussion.tex
...
Biofilm libraries were more even in shape than planktonic libraries (Figure 9) and OTUs enriched in biofilm libraries were enriched less dramatically than planktonic enriched OTUs. It's possible the planktonic environment is more uniform with respect to niche space and therefore produces more skewed rank abundance distributions. Similarly to the richness results, we found the shape contrasts of rank abundance distributions between biofilm and planktonic libraries in our data to be in contrast to that reported by \citet{22237539} although this may be an artifact of each study's different experimental design (see above).
\subsection{Enriched Taxa in High Carbon (C:P = 500) Treatment}
OTUs enriched in the high carbon amended mesocosm (C:P = 500)
included include OTUS in classic copiotroph
genera families such as
\textit{Vibrionacaea} and \textit{Pseudomonadaceae}. Interestingly, the one OTU depleted in the high carbon treatments is annotated as ing in the HTCC2188 order of the \textit{Gammaproteobacteria}. HTCC stands for high throughput culture collection and is a prefix for strains cultured under low nutrient conditions \cite{Cho_2004, Connon_2002}.
In summary this study shows mechanistic links between large scale community level dynamics the underlying populations level that drive them. Ulimately large scale changes in ecosystem processes are driven by composite effects of microbial communities actiing as a synthesis of physiological events embedded in a complex biotic and abiotic matrix.