this is for holding javascript data
Chuck fixed section numbering
almost 9 years ago
Commit id: 9ea01e776c660e45e33abd7c424901124b669008
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Materials_and_Methods.tex b/Materials_and_Methods.tex
index dd856e0..e410bd3 100644
--- a/Materials_and_Methods.tex
+++ b/Materials_and_Methods.tex
...
reactions, which were performed and subsequently enriched. Sequencing
followed established manufacture protocols (454 Life Sciences).
\subsection{Sequence Quality Control and Analysis}
\subsubsection{Quality Control} \subsubsection{Sequence quality control} The 16S/23S sequence collections were
demultiplexed and sequences with sample barcodes not matching expected barcodes
were discarded. We used the maximum expected error metric \citep{23955772}
calculated from sequence quality scores to cull poor quality sequences from the
dataset. Specifically, we discarded any sequence with a maximum expected error
count greater than 1 after truncating to
175 nt. The forward primer and barcode was trimmed from the remaining reads. We
checked that all primer trimmed, error screened and truncated sequences were
derived from the same region of the LSU or SSU rRNA gene (23S and 16S
...
rank, minimum sequence identity for hits at 90\% and the maximum accepted hits
value was set to 3).
\subsubsection{Clustering} \subsubsection{Sequence clustering} Reads were clustered into OTUs following
the UParse pipeline. Specifically USearch (version 7.0.1001) was used to
establish cluster centroids at a 97\% sequence identity level from the quality
controlled data and map quality controlled reads to the centroids. The initial
centroid establishment algorithm incorporates a quality control step wherein
potentially chimeric reads are not allowed to become cluster seeds.
Additionally, we discarded singleton reads. Eighty-eight and 98\% of quality
controlled reads could be mapped back to our cluster seeds at a 97\% identity
cutoff for the 16S and 23S sequences, respectively.
\subsubsection{Alpha and Beta diversity analyses} Alpha diversity calculations
were made using PyCogent Python bioinformatics modules \citep{17708774}.
...
(within sites) as weights. The principal coordinate OTU weighted averages were
then expanded to match the site-wise variances \citep{vegan}.
\subsubsection{Identifying
Enriched enriched OTUs} We used an RNA-Seq differential
expression statistical framework to find OTUs enriched in the given sample
classes (R package DESeq2 developed by \citet{Love_2014}) (for review of
RNA-Seq differential expression statistics applied to microbiome OTU count data