this is for holding javascript data
Chuck figures.tex file
over 9 years ago
Commit id: 5b7e0698b0bf07b915540aa44865c8389a10c912
deletions | additions
diff --git a/figures.tex b/figures.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7e47150
--- /dev/null
+++ b/figures.tex
...
\section*{Figures}
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{figures/conceptualmodel/biofilmsubsidiesFigs06252013.001.jpg}
\end{center}
\textbf{\refstepcounter{figure}\label{fig:conceptual} Figure \arabic{figure}.}
{Carbon subsidies in the form of glucose alleviate the
dependence of heterotrophic bactria on algal derived C (C)
exudates. This should result in an increase in resource space and
biomass for bacteria and a decrease in resource space and biomass for
algae due to increased competition for phosphorus (P). We hypothesized
that this predicted change in biomass pool size of these two grouops
will result in changes in the plankton community composition of both
groups that will propogate to to the composition of biofilm communities
for both groups.}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{figures/pool size/biofilmsubsidiesFigs07252013.003.jpg}
\end{center}
\textbf{\refstepcounter{figure}\label{fig:pool_size} Figure \arabic{figure}.}
{Increases in C resulted in decreases in A) planktonic
algal biomass (estiated as Chl \textit{a} but B) not algal biomass
present in the biofilm \textit{a} in each. In contrast both C) biofilm
total biomass and D) number of planktonic bacterial cells increased
with increasing C subsidies. Responses in treatments separated by
different letters were statistically different from one another
(p<0.05) as was the highest C:P treatment for planktonic bacterial
abundance compared to the the control or the C:P = 10 treatment
(p<0.05). The bacterial abudance sample for the C:P = 100 treatment was
lost before analysis and is therfore not reported in panel d.}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{figures/lightmicroscopy.002/biofilmsubsidiesFigs06252013.003.jpg}
\end{center}
\textbf{\refstepcounter{figure}\label{fig:microscope} Figure \arabic{figure}.}
{The structure (density of cells and thickness of biofilm) and
the amount of EPS (cloudy material) increased with increasing C
subsidies from the control to the highest C treatment (C:P=500).}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{figures/combined_rarefaction5/combined_rarefaction5.png}
\end{center}
\textbf{\refstepcounter{figure}\label{fig:rarefaction} Figure \arabic{figure}.}
{Rarefaction curves for all biofilm versus plankton libraries.
Each panel represents a single C:P treament and time point. Richness is
greater for all planktonic communities when compared to corresponding
biofilm communities.}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{figures/biplot_combined1/biplot_combined1.png}
\end{center}
\textbf{\refstepcounter{figure}\label{fig:pcoa} Figure \arabic{figure}.}
{Principal coordinates ordination of bray-curtis distances for
23S rRNA plastid libraries and 16S rRNA gene libraries. OTU points are
weighted pricipal coordinate averages (weights are relative abundace
values in each sample) and the variance along each pricipal axis is
expanded to match the site variance. Point annotations denote the
amended C:P ratio for the mesocosm from which each sample was derived.
test}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{figures/rank_abund_shape/rank_abund_shape2.png}
\end{center}
\textbf{\refstepcounter{figure}\label{fig:rank_abund_shape} Figure \arabic{figure}.}
{Rank abundance plots for all date-amendment combinations.}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{figures/l2fc_pval_all1/l2fc_pval_all.png}
\end{center}
\textbf{\refstepcounter{figure}\label{fig:l2fc} Figure \arabic{figure}.}
{$log_2$ of lifestyle OTU proportion mean ratios (bioflm or plankton)
and corresponding, adjusted p-values. Each point represents one
OTU proportion mean ratio and points are grouped along the
x-axis by Order. Outlined points have adjusted p-values below a
false discovery rate of 0.10.}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{figures/rank_abund1/rank_abund.png}
\end{center}
\textbf{\refstepcounter{figure}\label{fig:rank_abund} Figure \arabic{figure}.}
{Rank abundance plots. Each panel represents a single time
point and C:P. The "rank" of each OTU is based on planktonic sample
relative abundance. Each position along the x-axis represents a single
OTU. Both the x and y axes are scaled logarithmically.}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.75\columnwidth]{figures/integrated_rarefaction/integrated_rarefaction.png}
\end{center}
\textbf{\refstepcounter{figure}\label{fig:integ_rarefaction} Figure \arabic{figure}.}
{Rarefaction plots for all samples. Planktonic libraries have
been integrated such that the count for each OTU is the sum of counts
across all samples.}
\end{figure}