deletions | additions       diff --git a/Introduction.tex b/Introduction.tex  index 722d97d..c24c5b1 100644  --- a/Introduction.tex  +++ b/Introduction.tex 
...
In a crude sense, biofilm and planktonic microbial communities can be broken into two key groups: phototrophic eukaryotes (hereafter algae) and heterotrophic bacteria and archaea. This dichotomy, while somewhat artificial, has been shown to be a powerful paradigm for understanding community shifts across ecosystems of varying trophic state \cite{Cotner_2002}. Heterotrophic bacteria meet some to all of their organic C requirements from algal produced C while simultaneously competing with algae for limiting nutrients such as P. The presence of external C inputs, such as terrigenous carbon leaching from the watershed \cite{Jansson_2008, Karlsson_2012} or C exudates derived from macrophytes \cite{Stets_2008, Stets_2008b}, can alleviate bacterioplankton reliance on algal derived carbon and shift the relationship from commensal and competitive to strictly competitive (\citet{Stets_2008}, Figure 1). Under this mechanism increased carbon supply should increase the resource space available to the bacteria and lead to increased competition for P, decreasing P available for algal biosynthesis – assuming that bacteria are superior competitors for P as has been observed (\citet{COTNER_1992}, Figure 1). These dynamics should result in the increase in bacterial biomass relative to the algal biomass along a gradient of increasing labile carbon inputs.  While these gross level dynamics have been discussed conceptually \cite{Cotner_2002} and demonstrated empirically \cite{Stets_2008}, the effect that thesegross level  shifts in the bulk biomass pool have onindividual  membership and structuries  of the algal and bacterial community has not been evaluated in plankton or biofilm communities. biofilms.  In addition, how dynamics in planktonic communities are propagated to biofilms during community assembly is not well understood. Intuitively, shifts in planktonic community composition should alter the available pool that can be recruited into a biofilm. Therefore, if bacterioplankton diversity increases, the number of potential bacterial species that can be recruited to the biofilm should also increase, potentially increasing bacterial diversity within the biofilm. Similarly, a decrease in P available to algae should decrease algal pool size, potentially decreasing algal diversity and therefore candidate algal taxa that are available for biofilm formation. In addition, carbon in excess of resource requirements may increase the production of extra cellular polysaccharides (EPS) by planktonic cells thus increasing the probability that planktonic cells are incorporated into a biofilm by adhesion. If alpha diversity increases with increasing biomass pool size, these mechanisms suggest that an increase in labile carbon to the system should result in increased alpha diversity in both bacterial plankton and bacterial biofilm communities while decreasing alpha diversity within both planktonic and biofilm algal communities. We addressed To address  these ideas by designing we designed  this study to test a) if carbon subsidies shifted the biomass balance between autotrophs and heterotrophs within the biofilm or its seed pool (the plankton) and b) if how  these putative changes in pool size altered all populations within the community similarly, or if the relative abundance among the algal membership  and bacterial populations in either structure of  the plankton or the biofilm were communities and  affected differently. recruitment of plankton during biofilm community assembly.