this is for holding javascript data
Ethan Hain edited subsection_Dataset_The_specific_modality__.tex
over 8 years ago
Commit id: dc81ac6681c22065efa63cb80ed1ed0bb09c3b04
deletions | additions
diff --git a/subsection_Dataset_The_specific_modality__.tex b/subsection_Dataset_The_specific_modality__.tex
index 97ea28d..cf7a559 100644
--- a/subsection_Dataset_The_specific_modality__.tex
+++ b/subsection_Dataset_The_specific_modality__.tex
...
Of the 17 targets in the MUV dataset, we identified 10 that had a receptor-ligand structure in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) where the ligand had sub-$\mu$M affinity. The interaction diagrams of these structures are shown in Figure~\ref{targets}. For each of these structures we identified interacting fragments that could potentially serve as anchor fragments. For each target we consider a variety of fragments in order to evaluate the sensitivity of the approach to the choice of fragment. We selected relatively generic functional groups (at most \textbf{X} atoms) that were sufficiently common among both the actives and decoys to yield meaningful results and that were clearly forming interactions with the receptor.
\textbf \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{}
Fragment
SMARTS
Cathg1
c1ccccc1[R]
Cathg2
c1ccccc1[C]
Cathg3
c1ccccc1[!H]
Cathg4
a1aaaaa1[!H]
Cathg5
c1ccccc1[C]
Eralpha_pot1
c1ccccc1O
Eralpha_pot2
c1ccccc1[!H]
Eralpha_pot3
a1aaaaa1[!H]
Eralpha1
c1ccccc1O
Eralpha2
c1ccccc1N
Eralpha3
c1ccccc1[!H]
Eralpha4
a1aaaaa1[!H]
Erbeta1
c1ccccc1O
Erbeta2
c1ccccc1N
Erbeta3
c1ccccc1[!H]
Erbeta4
a1aaaaa1[!H]
Fak1
c1[c,n]cccn1
Fak2
c1cccc([!H])c1
Fak3
a1a([!H])aaaa1
Fak4
n1[c,n][c,n]cc1
Fxia1
a1aaan1
Fxia2
c1[c,n]cc[c,s]1
Fxia3
c1[c,n]cc([!H])[c,s,o]1
Fxia4
a1aaaa1[!H]
Hivrt1
a1aaan1
Hivrt2
c1aacn1
Hivrt3
c1aac([!H])n1
Hivrt4
a1aaaa1[!H]
Hivrt5
c1ccccc1[Cl,O]
Hsp901
c1ccccc1O
Hsp902
c1ccccc1[!H]
Hsp903
a1aaaaa1[!H]
Pka1
c1[c,n]cccn1
Pka2
a1ncccn1
Pka3
a1([!H])ncccn1
Pka4
c1[c,n]c([!H])ccn1
Rho1
c1[c,n]cccn1
Rho2
c1[c,n]c([!H])ccn1
\end{tabular}
\end{table}