this is for holding javascript data
Ryan Boyden edited subsection_Morphology_statistics_The_morphology__.tex
almost 8 years ago
Commit id: aaafe65fd6698bdab4668e972d660fe2c4d98ad6
deletions | additions
diff --git a/subsection_Morphology_statistics_The_morphology__.tex b/subsection_Morphology_statistics_The_morphology__.tex
index a263bf7..c46e018 100644
--- a/subsection_Morphology_statistics_The_morphology__.tex
+++ b/subsection_Morphology_statistics_The_morphology__.tex
...
\subsection{Morphology statistics}
The morphology statistic color plots are shown in Fig. ???. Although the Genus statistic produces a wide range of distances, we find that it fails to display any clear trends, given its color-plot's shape. Both Dendrogram statistics show clear sensitivities to stellar mass-loss rate. The histogram statistic yields the largest distances for strong wind and purely turbulent pairings, followed by strong wind and weak wind pairings. The behavior is similar to that of many other statistics, but the histogram statistic's
hierarchy trend continues down onto weak wind model
comparisons. This unique behavior indicates comparisons, indicating a very clear sensitivity towards wind activity.
The number of features statistic is also sensitive to winds, but it shows different correlations between strong wind model pairings, opposite of the histogram statistic's. By a significant amount, the largest distances occur for strong wind and weak wind pairings, as opposed to those of strong wind and purely turbulent models. The behavior does not occur in weaker wind model comparisons, as pairings between these and purely turbulent ones are larger than pairings between weaker wind models.