Ryan Boyden edited subsection_Intensity_statistics_We_show__.tex  almost 8 years ago

Commit id: 9ea9c0e415c619ca18b49e1e93ecd1ffd0e69ed3

deletions | additions      

       

%and the structure to be correlated with changes in magnetic field strengths. The correlations between weak wind models does not occur in the PCA and SCF, since their distances for W2 are quite small. Thus, they are weakly sensitive to magnetic field strength. Here, we only note blurring in our strong wind models  The Cramer statistic is by definition a distance metric, so it we include its discussion and analysis here. As described in Yeremi et. al (2014), this statistic compares the interpoint differences between two data sets with the point differences between each individual data set. Following K16, we compute the Cramer statistic using only the top 20\% of the integrated-intensity values. The statistic exhibits a behavior different from that of the other intensity statistics. As figure ??? shows, the Cramer statistic displays very large distances between purely turbulent runs and runs with any degree of feedback. Wind strength appears less important to the statistic than wind presence does, which indicates a binary sensitivity to stellar-mass loss rates. The Cramer statistic is also sensitive to magnetic field strength, because of as seen in  the different varying  distances between the purely turbulent models. Considering the various degrees of sensitivity, we find the PCA to be strong a candidate for constraining feedback signatures. As Figure 3 shows, this statistic displays sharp, distinct features for a strong wind model, and its color-plot only shows strong sensitivity to changes in stellar-mass loss rate. The other intensity statistics either exhibit less-distinct features, or react to multiple physical changes. Because of this, we recommend using these statistics in concert with the PCA. Of the remaining intensity statistics, the SCF is the second most promising candidate, as its color-plot behaves similarly to the PCA.