deletions | additions       diff --git a/section_Stastical_Comparisons_label_comparisons__.tex b/section_Stastical_Comparisons_label_comparisons__.tex  index bee7ab2..3e79a31 100644  --- a/section_Stastical_Comparisons_label_comparisons__.tex  +++ b/section_Stastical_Comparisons_label_comparisons__.tex 
...
\section{Stastical \section{Statistical  Comparisons}\label{comparisons} We present a series {\bf for reader sanity we should change the name  of comparisons W2T2t0 to just T2t0; likewise drop the Ws for the other models at t0. Unforunately this means retitling the labels in the plots. We can hold off until for some iterations in case other changes as suggested by the E's need to be made. }  We calculate the statistics and distance  between each pair of spectral cubes. However, since few prior statistical studies have investigated the impact of feedback, we first compare the statistics for  twosynthetic observations using  fiducial outputs outputs:  W1T2t0.2 and W2T2t0. W2T2t0 T2t0.  [ Move above: Previous numerical studies have compared differences in Mach number, magnetic field strength, and driving scale \citep[e.g.,][]{}. \citet{burkhart??}, an observational analysis of HI, noted the possible signature of supernovae on the bispectrum. While \citet{swift08} identify a break in the power spectrum of the $^{13}$CO intensity moment map, which they attribute to the influence of protostellar outflows (the break is absent in the $^{12}$CO data). [check Adam Frank and co.; hansen et al. 2012]] %our main goal is to explore how feedback shapes cloud turbulence.   T2t0  is a simulated turbulent molecular cloud (T2) (turbulent realization T2)  prior to wind launching. W1T2t0.2 is begins with  the same turbulent molecular cloud turbulence  as W2T2t0 T2t0  (T2), but we simulate it follow its evolution  for another 0.2 Myr (t0.2) with wind launching model W1. W2 %W2  does correspond to another wind model, but at the initial time, the wind model has not been introduced to the simulation. Thus, the two runs begin with the same turbulent seed, but the turbulence in  one run contains feedback is shaped by feedback,  while in  the other does not (make this sentence better). the turbulence is ``pristine".  For each statistic in table Table  ???, we compare the results produced with runs W1T2t0.2 and W2T2t0, T2t0  and identify qualitative differences. RB May be best to organize by type of statistic. How about: