Ryan Boyden edited subsection_Morphology_Statistics_The_morphology__.tex  almost 8 years ago

Commit id: 39b265900a1f9f04c303d1bb1b8d6a5f654a649d

deletions | additions      

       

\subsection{Morphology Statistics}  The morphology statistic color plots are shown in Fig. ???. Although the Genus Statistic produces a wide range of distances, we find that it fails to display any clear sensitivities, given its shape (is this the right word?). Both Dendrogram statisticsdo  show clear sensitivities towards stellar mass-loss rates. The histogram statistic outputs the clearest hierarchy. It yields the largest distances for strong wind and purely turbulent pairings, followed by strong wind and weak wind pairings. This behavior among strong wind model comparisons is similar to that of many other statistics, but the histogram statistic's hierarchy continues down onto weak wind model comparisons (add another sentence on this?). comparisons.  This unique behavior indicates a very clear sensitivity towards wind activity. The Number of features statistic is also sensitive to winds, but its hierarchy between strong wind model pairings is opposite of the histogram statistic's. By a significant amount, the largest distances occur for strong wind and weak wind pairings, as opposed to  those of strong wind and purely turbulent models. The behavior does not occur in weaker wind model comparisons, as pairings between these and purely turbulent ones are larger than those pairings  between themselves. Although the histogram statistic produces a clearer color plot, we find both Dendrogram Statistics to be effective at constraining feedback signatures. They are largely sensitive to changes in winds, and their statistical outputs produce distinct differences corresponding to feedback. For the Histogram statistic, we see a different distribution shape and end behavior; for the Number of features statistic, we see very different slopes, for a wind pairing that does not even yield the largest distance.